La compétition des régionalismes en Amérique du Nord : contestation, espaces redéfinis et émergence des identités transfrontalières
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte de la mondialisation et de la formation des nouveaux régionalismes continentaux, un ensemble de transformations poussent à la reformulation des identités. En Amérique du Nord en particulier, plusieurs facteurs sont en jeu, notamment les questions relatives à la définition de la modernité, à la forme du cosmopolitisme, à l’inclusion des divers acteurs laissés dans l’ombre auparavant (femmes, autochtones, etc.). Divers agents, telles les corporations transnationales, sont même actives dans la promotion de ces nouvelles identités, ce qui ressort dans le recyclage publicitaire qu’elles font de leurs formulations antérieures. C’est la rencontre de ces facteurs sociaux, économiques, et politiques qui constitue la problématique des espaces de référence identitaire et des définitions identitaires transfrontalières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".