MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141368513 · doi:10.1145/2507924.2507966

Efficient relay deployment for controlling connectivity in delay tolerant mobile networks

2013· article· en· W2141368513 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhiyu Wang, Mário A. Nascimento, M.H. MacGregor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceComputer networkSoftware deploymentNetwork partitionNode (physics)Greedy algorithmHeuristicPartition (number theory)Disjoint setsPath (computing)Distributed computingTransmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mobile networks, node movements may lead to a situation called network partition where an end-to-end path may never exist because the network is divided into several isolated subnetworks. Deploying stationary relays introduces new transmission opportunities leading to the improvement of network connectivity and performance. The majority of the proposed solutions concentrated on deploying the minimum number of relays in the network. However, relay deployment should also be resilient regarding relay node failures. In this paper, we show how the relay deployment problem can be modelled as a k-element connectivity problem in which multiple relay-disjoint paths are deployed to connect isolated subnetworks. To solve this problem, we present three heuristic algorithms targeting at finding the minimum number of relays to form k-element connected networks. Our experiments using synthetic and real data showed that the proposed greedy algorithm is 2 or 3 orders of magnitude faster and never worse than the other two algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207