Combining Vocal Source and MFCC Features for Enhanced Speaker Recognition Performance Using GMMs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents seven novel spectral features for speaker recognition. These features are the spectral centroid (SC), spectral bandwidth (SBW), spectral band energy (SBE), spectral crest factor (SCF), spectral flatness measure (SFM), Shannon entropy (SE) and Renyi entropy (RE). The proposed spectral features can quantify some of the characteristics of the vocal source or the excitation component of speech. This is useful for speaker recognition since vocal source information is known to be complementary to the vocal tract transfer function, which is usually obtained using the Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) or linear predication cepstral coefficients (LPCC). To evaluate the performance of the spectral features, experiments were performed using a text-independent cohort Gaussian mixture model (GMM) speaker identification system. Based on 623 users from the TIMIT database, the spectral features achieved an identification accuracy of 99.33% when combined with the MFCC based features and when using undistorted speech. This represents a 4.03% improvement over the baseline system trained with only MFCC and ΔMFCC features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".