Controller design using multigranular architecture of fuzzy inference and Petri nets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fuzzy inference is a method to describe nonlinear input-output relationships using fuzzy if-then rules. Continuous values of the inputs and outputs are converted into granules by fuzzy sets, and each granule is labeled with a symbol. Fuzzy inference has a multigranular architecture consisting of continuous values and symbols, and this architecture has worked well to incorporate experts' know-how into fuzzy controls. One of the important problems of fuzzy control is to guarantee stability of the fuzzy control system. The authors have applied Petri nets to the stability analysis of the fuzzy control system. A theory of asymptotic stability has been derived for the symbolic representation of the control system. The paper presents a new method to bridge between the stability analysis on the symbolic level and the actual behavior of the control system on the numerical level. The new method uses a generalized fuzzy Petri net model and its neural network representation. The paper introduces a guideline for designing a fuzzy control system which guarantees the validity of the stability analysis on the symbolic representation of the control system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".