Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des médaillons de porcelaine, fabriqués dès les années 1850, aux plaques funéraires, aujourd’hui gravées au laser, la plastique de la photo funéraire évolue dans son propos sur la représentation commémorative du corps. Ce sujet trop rarement abordé est ici considéré en termes d’image et d’imaginaire et de propos mémoriel. En effet, la photographie funéraire ne médiatise pas seulement le portrait du défunt, sa plastique renseigne indirectement sur l’image retenue par les proches pour faire leur deuil d’un défunt selon une esthétique et des codes partagés par la famille, les amis, concitoyens et/ou compatriotes. Sur les tombes, la disposition de ces portraits peut reproduire métaphoriquement une hiérarchie familiale ou sociale, effective ou fantasmée. Selon cette enquête, le photographique funéraire se révèle un objet de culture populaire évolutif qui, en Europe comme en Amérique du Nord, fait image, sens et propos dans l’espace de la tombe comme dans l’espace du cimetière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.153 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".