Action of Low Calcemic 1 ,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Analogue EB1089 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)] and its analogues inhibit growth of various types of cancer cells. Although the therapeutic potential of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) is limited by its tendency to induce hypercalcemia, analogues such as EB1089 are potent inhibitors of cell growth and exhibit reduced calcemic effects. We analyzed the antiproliferative and calcemic effects of EB1089 in tissue culture and animal models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to investigate its potential as a chemotherapeutic/chemopreventive agent. METHODS: The effects of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and EB1089 on cell growth and expression of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and p27(KIP1), which encode cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and a novel target, gadd45alpha, a growth-arrest and DNA-damage gene, were monitored in cultured murine AT-84 SCC cells. The effects of these agents on AT-84 cell growth in vitro and on growth of AT-84 tumors in syngeneic C3H mice were monitored; treatment started at the time of tumor implantation (early tumor model) or after 12 days (late tumor model). Weight and serum calcium levels were also monitored in these animals. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Both 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and EB1089 arrested proliferation of AT-84 cells in G(0)/G(1) phase, inhibited p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression, and induced expression of p27(KIP1) protein. 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) also enhanced the expression of gadd45alpha, apparently by a p53-independent mechanism. There was a statistically significant decrease in tumor growth for 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)-treated mice (P<.001 for early tumor model) and EB1089-treated mice (P<.001 and P =.001 for early and late tumor models, respectively). Unlike 1,25(OH)(2)D(3), EB1089 did not induce cachexia or hypercalcemia. The effects of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and EB1089 on expression of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and GADD45alpha were similar in tumors and in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: EB1089 completely inhibited growth of AT-84 SCC cells at nanomolar concentrations, reduced tumor growth, and did not have calcemic effects. Our results support continued investigation of EB1089 as a chemopreventive/chemotherapeutic agent for head and neck SCC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".