MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141437586 · doi:10.7202/029441ar

Un corps de femme dans un sport d’homme. Regard sur l’expérience corporelle de judokas tunisiennes

2009· article· fr· W2141437586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monia Lachheb

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet essai se propose d'interpréter le vécu corporel de Tunisiennes investies dans une pratique sportive traditionnellement réservée aux hommes. Leur vécu se structure à partir de la perception du corps propre qui se trouve inévitablement impliquée dans des transactions relationnelles, notamment avec l'autre de sexe masculin. À partir d'un corpus d'entretiens, il se révèle que les femmes judokas reconnaissent les attributs masculins de leur corporéité. Elles expriment leur écart par rapport aux normes dominantes qui définissent le modèle du corps féminin et leur indisposition générée par leur corps différent. Néanmoins, les critères de définition de la féminité et de la masculinité demeurent constants et s'inscrivent dans la logique de l'ordre social établi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207