Undrained capacity of a hybrid subsea skirted mat with caissons under combined loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skirted mudmats are commonly used to support offshore infrastructure. However, these may not be able to provide sufficient capacity to notably withstand the lateral loads applied by jumpers and connectors. The concept of hybrid foundation system was therefore proposed to enhance the capacity in a targeted fashion, through addition of internal suction caisson compartments. This paper presents a numerical investigation into the undrained bearing capacity of a rectangular-shaped hybrid foundation with two caisson units. Uniaxial capacities under vertical, horizontal, and moment loading are reported, but the focus lies on the horizontal–moment planes due to the anticipated low vertical load on the foundation. Detailed discussion highlights the contribution of the internal caisson compartments to the significant increases in horizontal capacity compared to a simple rectangular skirted mat through changes in the failure mechanism. This results not only in changes in size, but also in shape, of the capacity envelope. The study was extended to more general horizontal–moment loading conditions, where the shape of the capacity envelope was found to remain approximately constant. This applies to the hybrid foundation and the rectangular skirted mat in the homogeneous soil considered here. An expression is proposed that provides a slightly conservative approximation of the capacity envelope under combined horizontal and moment loading from any direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".