Amlodipine Decreases Iron Uptake and Oxygen Free Radical Production in the Heart of Chronically Iron Overloaded Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hereditary hemochromatosis is a disorder of iron metabolism, which is currently the most prevalent autosomal recessive disorder in the world, with an expression of the homozygous form occurring in approximately 1 in 200 individuals of European descent. Approximately one third of patients with hemochromatosis die of iron-induced cardiac complications. Although the exact mechanism is not known, it is believed that the toxicity of excess iron in biological systems is due to its ability to catalyze the generation of harmful reactive oxygen free radical species (ROS), which can damage proteins, lipids, and DNA. There is preliminary evidence to suggest that non-transferrin-bound iron uptake in the myocardium may occur through voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels, and that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) may possess antioxidant properties. Accordingly, the authors hypothesized that the administration of amlodipine besylate would (1) decrease iron uptake in the myocardium and (2) decrease oxygen free radical production as measured by cytotoxic aldehyde-derived peroxidation products in a murine model of iron overload cardiomyopathy. The findings show that the CCB amlodipine is partially effective in limiting iron uptake in the heart and significantly inhibits the production of ROS in chronically iron-loaded mice. These are important preliminary findings because they suggest that CCBs may have significance in the clinical management of genetic disorders of iron metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".