Guidelines for Premeal Insulin Dose Reduction for Postprandial Exercise of Different Intensities and Durations in Type 1 Diabetic Subjects Treated Intensively With a Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen (Ultralente-Lispro)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and validate appropriate premeal insulin dose reductions for postprandial exercises of different intensities and durations to minimize the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight male type 1 diabetic patients on a basal-bolus insulin regimen of ultralente (UL) as basal insulin and lispro (LP) as premeal insulin were tested in a randomized, crossover fashion during postprandial exercise at 25% VO2max for 60 min, 50% VO2max for 30 and 60 min, and 75% VOmax for 30 min starting 90 min after a standardized mixed breakfast (600 kcal, 75 g carbohydrates). Each subject served as his own control and was rested after a full dose of insulin LP (LP 100%) and/or 50% (LP 50%) and/or 25% (LP 25%) of the current dose. RESULTS: At all intensities, the full premeal insulin dose was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia. At 25% VO2max for 60 min, a 50% reduction in the premeal insulin dose resulted in plasma glucose of -0.62 mmol/l compared with baseline at the end of exercise. At 50% VO2max for 30 and 60 min, 50 and 75% reductions of the premeal insulin dose were associated with plasma glucose of -0.39 and +0.49 mmol/l, respectively, at the end of the exercise. At 75% VO2max, a 75% reduction of the premeal insulin dose was required to achieve appropriate postexercise plasma glucose (+0.71 mmol/l). Such reductions in the premeal insulin dose resulted in a 75% decrease in the incidence of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS In well-controlled type 1 diabetic subjects on intensive insulin therapy with the basal-bolus (UL-LP) insulin regimen, risk of hypoglycemia can be minimized during postprandial exercises of different intensities and different durations by appropriate reduction of premeal insulin LP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".