MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141560016 · doi:10.1109/sitis.2009.45

Taxonomy of Musical Genres

2009· article· en· W2141560016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimbreCategorizationHistogramComputer scienceMusicalTaxonomy (biology)Artificial intelligenceNatural language processingInformation retrievalVisual artsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many researchers have been conducted to retrieve pertinent parameters and adequate models for automatic music genre classification. It plays a significant role in multimedia applications. In principle, the categorization of music is mostly done by people expert in the field. These are based on several attributes music (timbre, melody, etc.). Despite great efforts employed, the results are very subjective and not very satisfactory. In this work, an ergodic hidden model fully connected is used as one model for 65 musical pieces. Standard Real World Computing (RWC) is used as Database. After training, relative frequency of states transition (histogram) is proposed as a pattern to characterized musical genre. Also, a taxonomy based histogram is presented and compared to manual taxonomy of the RWC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207