MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141596386 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2011.2162624

All-Optical Short-Time Fourier Transform Based on a Temporal Pulse-Shaping System Incorporating an Array of Cascaded Linearly Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings

2011· article· en· W2141596386 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Li, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShort-time Fourier transformFiber Bragg gratingOpticsFourier transformBandwidth (computing)Optical filterBand-pass filterComputer sciencePhysicsOptical fiberTelecommunicationsFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An all-optical approach to implementing short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of a high-speed and broadband electrical signal is proposed and demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge. The STFT is implemented based on a temporal pulse shaping system incorporating an array of cascaded linearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings (LCFBGs). An electrical signal to be analyzed is applied to a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) to modulate the optical spectrum of a time-stretched optical pulse from a mode-locked laser (MLL). Each individual LCFBG in the LCFBG array functions as a bandpass filter to filter a specific range of the spectrum, which is equivalent to applying a window function to the corresponding section of the temporal signal, and at the same time, as a dispersive element to implement real-time Fourier transform. A theoretical analysis is performed which is verified by a numerical simulation and a proof-of-concept experiment. The key feature of this technique is that STFT can be implemented in real time which can find applications in analyzing an electrical signal with a bandwidth up to several hundreds of gigahertz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207