MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141634047 · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt548

The indication for perioperative red blood cell transfusions is a predictive risk factor for severe postoperative morbidity and mortality in children undergoing cardiac surgery

2014· article· en· W2141634047 on OpenAlexaff
Ariane Willems, C. Van Lerberghe, K. Gonsette, A. De Villé, Christian Mélot, Jean‐François Hardy, P. Van der Linden

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeBlood transfusionCardiac surgeryUnivariate analysisLogistic regressionRetrospective cohort studySurgeryCardiopulmonary bypassRisk factorAnesthesiaMultivariate analysisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: In paediatric cardiac surgery, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are given to treat haemorrhage or to increase oxygen delivery (therapeutic transfusion). Sometimes, RBCs are added to the prime solution to avoid a too low haematocrit on bypass (CPB-driven transfusion). Our study investigated whether the reason for RBC transfusion might affect severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care level, children's hospital. The charts of all patients admitted between 2006 and 2009 were reviewed. Among transfused patients, children receiving a therapeutic transfusion were compared with those receiving a CPB-driven transfusion. The primary outcome was severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. Statistically significant variables founded with univariate analysis were incorporated in the multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a model that predicts severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. This model was then adjusted for clinically relevant variables that may interfere with 'indication for transfusion'. RESULTS: One hundred and one (48%) patients in the therapeutic and 92 (26%) patients in the CPB-driven transfusion group developed severe postoperative morbidity or died (P < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression showed that weight, ASA, calculated blood loss, intraoperative fluid balance, duration of CPB time and the indication group for transfusion [1.64 (1.03-2.62); P = 0.039] were independent risk factors for severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. The indication group for transfusion remained significant [2.0 (1.16-3.45); P = 0.013] after adjustment for significant predictors of indication for transfusion. Number of patients with infections, or neurological deficit, and length of mechanical ventilation, PICU and hospital length of stay, were significantly higher in the therapeutic compared with the CPB-driven transfusion group one. CONCLUSIONS: The indication group for transfusion has an impact on the occurrence of severe postoperative morbidity or mortality in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207