Experimental reduction of haematocrit affects reproductive performance in European starlings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Given the function of haemoglobin and observed increases in haematocrit during periods of increased energetic demands, haematocrit and haemoglobin are assumed to be related to aerobic capacity. Reductions in haematocrit and haemoglobin during reproduction are similar in magnitude to increases associated with aerobically demanding activities, and therefore, we sought to investigate whether these reductions in haematology have consequences for reproductive performance. We analysed associations between natural variation in haematology in free‐living European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) and reproductive performance. To test whether transient reductions in haematology during different stages of reproduction (egg production and late incubation/early chick rearing) affected measures of reproductive performance, we also manipulated haematology using phenylhydrazine ( PHZ ), which lyses red blood cells. To investigate effects of reductions of haematology during egg‐laying, we treated females with PHZ or saline (control) upon completion of their unmanipulated first clutch and removed eggs to induce the production and rearing of a replacement clutch. To investigate effects of reductions of haematology during chick rearing, we treated females during incubation of the unmanipulated first clutch and then monitored the subsequent hatching and rearing of the clutch. Individuals with higher haematocrit and haemoglobin initiated nesting earlier. Furthermore, higher haemoglobin levels during incubation were associated with a greater number of chicks fledged. PHZ treatment prior to egg production resulted in a significant delay in the laying of replacement clutches, but had no effect on provisioning rate or the size or number of chicks fledged. PHZ treatment during incubation and early chick rearing resulted in decreased hatchling mass in all years and a decrease in the size and number of fledglings in one of 2 years. The year that the effect of PHZ was observed appeared to be a particularly difficult year, as hatchling mass, brood size at hatching and at fledging were low among control females compared to other years. Our results suggest that a reduction in haematology during reproduction can be functionally significant, but that these costs are context‐dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".