MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141656362 · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4927

Milk production and somatic cell counts: A cow-level analysis

2012· article· en· W2141656362 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karen J. Hand, A. Godkin, D.F. Kelton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
FundersDairy Farmers of Ontario
KeywordsLactationSomatic cell countHerdAnimal scienceQuartileParity (physics)Milk productionBiologyMathematicsIce calvingStatisticsPregnancyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to quantify the relationship between 24-h milk loss and lactation milk loss due to mastitis at the cow level. For the year 2009, individual cow test-day production records from 2,835 Ontario dairy herds were examined. Each record consisted of 24-h milk and component yields, stage of lactation (days in milk, DIM), somatic cell count (SCC, ×10(3) cells/mL) and parity. The modeling was completed in 2 stages. In stage 1, for each animal in the study, the estimated slope from a linear regression of 24-h milk yield (kg), adjusted for DIM, the quadratic effect of DIM, and the 24-h fat yield (kg) on ln(SCC) was determined. In stage 2, the estimated slope were modeled using a mixed model with a random component due to herd. The fixed effects included season (warm: May to September, cool: October to April), milk quartile class [MQ, determined by the rank of the 24-h average milk yield (kg) over a lactation within the herd] and parity. The estimated slopes from the mixed model analysis were used to estimate 24-h milk loss (kg) by comparing to a referent healthy animal with an SCC value of 100 (×10(3) cells/mL) or less. Lactation milk loss (kg) was then estimated by using estimated 24-h milk loss within lactation by means of a test-day interval method. Lactation average milk loss (kg) and SCC were also estimated. Lastly, lactation milk loss (kg) was modeled on the log scale using a mixed model, which included the random effect of herd and fixed effects, parity, and the linear and quadratic effect of the number of 24-h test days within a lactation where SCC exceeded 100 (×10(3) cells/mL; S100). The effect of SCC was significant with respect to 24-h milk loss (kg), increasing across parity and MQ. In general, first-parity animals in the first MQ (lower milk yield animals) were estimated to have 45% less milk loss than later parity animals. Milk losses were estimated to be 33% less for animals in first parity and MQ 2 through 4 than later parity animals in comparable MQ. Therefore, the relative level of milk production was found to be a significant risk factor for milk loss due to mastitis. For animals with 24-h SCC, values of 200 (×10(3) cells/mL), 24-h milk loss ranged from 0.35 to 1.09 kg; with 24-h SCC values of 2,000 (×10(3) cells/mL), milk loss ranged from 1.49 to 4.70 kg. Lactation milk loss (kg) increased significantly as lactation average SCC increased, ranging from 165 to 919 kg. The linear and quadratic effect of S100 was a significant risk factor for lactation milk loss (kg), where greatest losses occurred in lactations with 5 or more 24-h test days where SCC exceeded 100 (×10(3) cells/mL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207