MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141673665 · doi:10.1109/uidis.2001.929931

On-line analytical processing while immersed in a CAVE

2002· article· en· W2141673665 on OpenAlexaff
Osmar R. Zai͏̈ane, Ayman Ammoura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVisualizationOnline analytical processingData visualizationVirtual machineHuman–computer interactionSet (abstract data type)Virtual realityInteractive visual analysisData warehouseData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a new approach for interactive visualization of data warehouses and data mining results in an immersed virtual environment. DIVE-ON is a data mining system prototype that is capable of constructing a multidimensional data model on a remote system, transporting pertinent views to a CAVE, creating an immersed virtual environment and providing an interactive data mining toolset. The main objective of this research is to examine the possibility of effective mining, visualizing and manipulating large amounts of distributed multidimensional data with little or no instructional help. To achieve this, DIVE-ON immerses the user in a virtual environment and provides a set of intuitive and effective interaction techniques within the CAVE environment. Intuitiveness was tackled by exploiting the user's considerable natural experience in interacting and navigating through a 3-dimensional world and by understanding the characteristics of a virtual environment that is well suited for the visual analysis of data. The ability to perform OLAP operations intuitively in such an environment provides the user with an effective means to conceptualize and gain an insight into large volumes of data from several distributed sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207