MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141681140 · doi:10.1002/anie.201410016

Impact of Pore Connectivity on the Design of Long‐Lived Zeolite Catalysts

2014· article· en· W2141681140 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Milina, Sharon Mitchell, D. Cooke, P. Crivelli, Javier Pérez‐Ramírez

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsZeoliteCatalysisStructuringRealization (probability)Materials sciencePorosityRational designMethanolPositroniumNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsPositronElectronEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Without techniques sensitive to complex pore architectures, synthetic efforts to enhance molecular transport in zeolite and other porous materials through hierarchical structuring lack descriptors for their rational design. The power of positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS) to characterize the pore connectivity in hierarchical MFI zeolites is demonstrated, establishing a direct link with the enhanced catalyst lifetime in the conversion of methanol to valuable hydrocarbons. The unique ability to capture subtleties of the hierarchical structure originates from the dynamic nature of the ortho-positronium response to the pore network. The findings reveal the strong dependence on the way in which the hierarchical zeolites are manufactured, having direct implications for the practical realization of these advanced catalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207