MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141719987 · doi:10.1109/tnb.2004.833681

Dynamic Ion Channel Activation Scheduling in Patch Clamp on a Chip

2004· article· en· W2141719987 on OpenAlex
Vikram Krishnamurthy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAustralian National University
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)ChipIon channelPatch clampNanotechnologyParallel computingMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2002, Fertig et al. made a remarkable invention: the first successful demonstration of a patch clamp on a chip--a planar quartz-based biological chip that contains up to several hundred ion channels. This patch-clamp chip can be used in massively parallel screens for ion channel activity, thereby providing a high-throughput screening tool for drug discovery efforts. In this paper, we propose computationally efficient dynamic stochastic scheduling algorithms for activating individual ion channels in the patch-clamp chip. By formulating the ion channel activation scheduling problem as a partially observed Markov decision process with a multiarmed bandit structure, near-optimal dynamic scheduling for activation of the individual channels is achieved to optimize the information gained from the patch-clamp chip. Numerical examples using state-of-the-art algorithms developed recently in artificial intelligence and operations research are presented to illustrate these dynamic ion channel (macromolecule) activation scheduling algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it