MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141722278 · doi:10.5539/jms.v3n2p110

Clarifying the Strategic Role of the HR Managers in the UAE Educational Institutions

2013· article· en· W2141722278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zahi Yaseen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Sustainability · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in MENA
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la RechercheUtah Agricultural Experiment Station
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BusinessHuman resourcesResource (disambiguation)Strategic managementPublic relationsKnowledge managementPolitical scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The education sector in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is abounding with forceful challenges. The competition between the private educational institutions is not within the same country any more, but opens to global competition including countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). This study aims to clarify the strategic role of human resource (HR) managers in the educational institutions in the UAE. Human resource management can play a strategic partner role in all organizations as well as in the educational institutions. Field data collection was accomplished by interview questionnaire survey and analyzed using SPPS. The findings revealed that HR’s role in the UAE educational institutions is not as a strategic partner. Most of the HR activities in these institutions have mainly focused on the administrative aspects of human resource management. The findings offer rare insight into clarifying the strategic role of the HR managers in the educational institutions in UAE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and SustainabilitySame topicSocioeconomic Development in MENAFrench-language works237,207