À la remorque de l’OCDE? Sécurité du revenu et valorisation du travail au Canada et aux États-Unis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pronostics sur une éventuelle « normalisation » des dispositifs de protection sociale à l'échelle de la planète soulèvent quelques doutes. Ainsi, au Canada et aux États-Unis, la conformité des politiques d'aide aux familles à faible revenu eu égard aux objectifs de la politique sociale « active » de l'OCDE se vérifie plus dans le discours que dans la réalité, car de profondes différences subsistent entre les deux pays et en leur sein, aux deux niveaux supérieurs de gouvernement. Les comparaisons internationales et la circulation transfrontalière des idées et des modèles politiques suscitées par des organisations comme l'OCDE sont peu susceptibles de mener à des convergences de fond lorsque les programmes sociaux des divers gouvernements visent des objectifs essentiellement différents, comme c'est le cas ici pour le soutien du revenu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".