MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141796472

Karl Respa and German Espionage in Canada

2005· article· en· W2141796472 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Grant W. Grams

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of military and strategic studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanEspionagePolitical sciencePower (physics)Work (physics)World War IIEconomic historyLawHistoryEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When Canada declared war on Germany on August 4, 1914, it created an opportunity for members of the German Foreign Office in the United States to organize sabotage activity. While the United States remained neutral until April 1917, the German Foreign Office carried out intelligence work throughout North America. Certain Germans were successful in their plans by delaying military aid destined for Europe in the early stages of the war. Germans targets included transportation links such as bridges, canals, railway hubs, communication centres, power plants, vessels on the Great Lakes and in coastal harbours, recently departed ships returning to Europe, and in Canadian factories. This article will deal with one German saboteur, Karl Respa, and his actions to help Germany through espionage in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of military and strategic studiesSame topicIntelligence, Security, War StrategyFrench-language works237,207