Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parmi les divers défis des prochaines années pour l’école, le principal sera de lui donner ou redonner une âme. Et indirectement, de contribuer à donner ou redonner à la civilisation la dimension humaniste et spirituelle qui lui est essentielle, quoique toujours fragile. Le débat québécois autour du cours « Éthique et culture religieuse » s’inscrit donc dans un débat beaucoup plus large – quoique moins médiatisé – sur la nature de l’éducation et le rôle de l’école. On croit ici qu’il est symptomatique du sort de la culture (au sens sociologique) ou de la civilisation. Si la civilisation influe sur l’école, les cours d’enseignement moral et religieux peuvent inversement avoir un impact sur la civilisation que l’on veut construire. Ainsi, à ce sujet, l’enjeu est bien plus large et profond que la seule tolérance ou le simple « apprendre à vivre ensemble ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".