MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141827516 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1999.832510

A Web ontology description language

2003· article· en· W2141827516 on OpenAlexaff
H. Ouahid, A. Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebOntologyXMLInformation retrievalData WebWeb standardsWeb modelingMarshallingWeb miningDatabaseWeb pageProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work presented is part of the Web Mining Agent (WMA) project under development in our Multimedia and Mobile Agent Research Laboratory. The purpose of this project is to develop an agent system capable of automatically locating and extracting user-specified data from the Web, and to dynamically populate a database with the data for later access and retrieval. The database is kept consistent with the changes that may occur on the Web sites from which data has been extracted. The knowledge needed for extracting and marshalling the desired information is stored in Web site ontologies. The ontologies are built using the Web ONtology DEscription Language (WONDEL), an XML and XPointer-based language that we have developed within the WMA project. This paper presents the overall architecture of the Web Mining Agent and describes WONDEL in detail. It also reports on experience gained in applying WMA to build a global university database from existing university Web sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.015
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationFrench-language works237,207