MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141839431 · doi:10.1177/14746514020020042301

Diabetes and sexual function in older adults: results of an international survey

2002· article· en· W2141839431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe British Journal of Diabetes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusSexual functionSexual dysfunctionSexually activeSexual intercourseGerontologyDemographyPsychiatryPopulationInternal medicineFamily medicineEndocrinologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors (GSSAB) is a contemporaneous survey of attitudes, behaviours, beliefs and satisfaction with relationships among men and women aged 40—80 years. Interviews were conducted with more than 26,000 subjects from 28 countries. Data captured from the survey indicated that the majority of adults are sexually active into their later years and that sex remains an important part of their overall life. This paper will discuss comparisons between diabetic and non-diabetic participants. Overall, approximately 10% of subjects reported that they had diabetes mellitus. Fewer diabetic than non-diabetic subjects reported that they had had sexual intercourse in the last 12 months and among sexually active subjects, diabetic subjects tended to report lower levels of physical and emotional satisfaction in their relationship with their partner. Symptoms of sexual dysfunction were more common among diabetic men than non-diabetic men. However, fewer than 15% of subjects had discussed their sexual problems with a doctor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it