Illustrations of local initiatives and the conditionsof their emergence, development and potential transferability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
démarches locales ou régionales, porteuses de changements, mais à moyen ou long terme.Certaines perspectives se dessinent de l'ensemble des projets rapportés.Ainsi, en continuité avec les préoccupations pour les facteurs culturels, il a été régulièrement souhaité d'intégrer davantage les connaissances provenant de l'anthropologie et de l'ethnologie.Comprendre pour pouvoir agir, en distinguant agir et manipuler, fut un thème récurrent.Ensuite, le besoin de formation et de soutien pour mieux utiliser les données de recherche et d'évaluation fut manifeste.En soi, les approches locales ou régionales induisent une multiplication des expériences et donc des sources potentielles d'informations pertinentes.En conséquence, le besoin de se comparer a été réaffirmé régulièrement.Pour plusieurs participants, il est devenu manifeste que la comparaison est nécessaire pour relativiser sa propre performance, ce qui permet de se valider,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".