MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141953966 · doi:10.1190/1.3552706

Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis

2011· article· en· W2141953966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSingular value decompositionAlgorithmNoise reductionLow-rank approximationSingular valueSynthetic dataNoise (video)Hankel matrixComputer scienceEstimatorMissing dataRank (graph theory)Projection (relational algebra)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a rank reduction algorithm that permits simultaneous reconstruction and random noise attenuation of seismic records. We based our technique on multichannel singular spectrum analysis (MSSA). The technique entails organizing spatial data at a given temporal frequency into a block Hankel matrix that in ideal conditions is a matrix of rank k, where k is the number of plane waves in the window of analysis. Additive noise and missing samples will increase the rank of the block Hankel matrix of the data. Consequently, rank reduction is proposed as a means to attenuate noise and recover missing traces. We present an iterative algorithm that resembles seismic data reconstruction with the method of projection onto convex sets. In addition, we propose to adopt a randomized singular value decomposition to accelerate the rank reduction stage of the algorithm. We apply MSSA reconstruction to synthetic examples and a field data set. Synthetic examples were used to assess the performance of the method in two reconstruction scenarios: a noise-free case and data contaminated with noise. In both cases, we found extremely low reconstructions errors that are indicative of an optimal recovery. The field data example consists of a 2D prestack volume that depends on common midpoint and offset. We use the MSSA reconstruction method to complete missing offsets and, at the same time, increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it