MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141967761 · doi:10.7202/602057ar

Implications macroéconomiques des théories microéconomiques modernes

2009· article· fr· W2141967761 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Edmond Malinvaud

Bibliographic record

VenueL Actualité économique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEconomicsMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il arrive que des chercheurs se consacrant à la théorie microéconomique prétendent tirer de leurs résultats des implications macroéconomiques, qui sont alors tantôt optimistes tantôt pessimistes. Il ne peut s’agir que de conjectures dont l’intérêt suppose qu’elles s’insèrent dans les cadres usuels de l’analyse macroéconomique et qu’elles se prêtent à des tests empiriques. Deux types de dysfonctionnement concernent la macroéconomie. En dehors d’eux ni l’indétermination de certains équilibres ni la non-linéarité de certaines relations n’ont nécessairement de portée pour l’explication de la croissance, de l’emploi ou de l’inflation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Actualité économiqueSame topicEconomic theories and modelsFrench-language works237,207