Local Excision Without Radiation for High‐Grade Soft‐Tissue Sarcoma ofthe Extremity and Superficial Trunk
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose. Limb-sparing surgery combined with radiation treatment has become the accepted treatment for patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma. Adjuvant radiation was not routinely used at this institution for patients with clear margins after surgery.This retrospective review analyses the outcome of this group of patients.Patients and methods. Patients studied were referred from 1984 to 1995, were over 16 years of age, were diagnosed with primary high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity or superficial trunk, had clear margins after excision and did not receive radiation as a part of their initial treatment. A total of 46 patients were identified.Results. At 5 years, the local control rate was 87%, disease-specific survival was 75% and overall survival was 68%. Of the 6 local recurrences, 3 were located in the buttock (from a total of 7 patients with primary tumours of the buttock), 3 had a primary size of >/= 10 cm (from a total of 8 primary tumours of that size) and all were deep tumours.Discussion. Our data, and those from other reports, suggest that in carefully selected patients appropriate surgery alone results in acceptable local control and survival, and that the morbidity of radiation can be avoided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it