Robust Optimization of Multiple Timing Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern field-programmable gate array (FPGA) circuit designs often contain multiple clocks and complex timing constraints, and achieving these constraints requires timing optimization at all stages of the computer-aided design (CAD) flow. To our knowledge, no prior published work has either described or quantitatively evaluated how to compute connection timing criticalities for circuits with multiple timing constraints in order to best guide CAD optimization algorithms. While single-clock techniques have a simple extension to multi-clock circuits, this formulation is not robust for circuits with multiple constraints of different magnitudes, or impossible constraints. We describe a robust method of timing optimization for circuits with multiple timing constraints, implemented in the open-source versatile place and route FPGA CAD tool. Our formulation can optimize multiple constraints well, even in the case where some constraints are impossible, and achieves over 20% greater clock speed with aggressive constraints than a straight-forward extension of single-clock work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it