Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several changes at PALAIOS this year, to the editorship and to the journal itself, which pave a new way forward for SEPM journals in the scientific publishing world. SEPM journals are competing with open-access journals, unfunded mandates for open access to society journals, and increasing costs for publishing. PALAIOS and its Editorial Board stand ready for these challenges. We will continue to strive to provide the best venue to publish innovative research on all aspects of past and present biological, geological, chemical, and atmospheric processes that can be interpreted and applied to discovering solutions to past, present, and future paleontological and geological problems. One of the first changes to PALAIOS is the rotation of editors. As of 2012, PALAIOS editorship rotation will be staggered every two years, so that the four-year term of each editor will overlap. Previous editorships involved the rotation of new editors as the outgoing editors stepped down, taking with them the corporate knowledge of how PALAIOS was run in terms of daily functions, structure of the Editorial Board, journal style and format, and budget planning and maintenance. We anticipate that this new way of editorship rotation will keep PALAIOS running smoothly, as the new editor joins the helm without the added pressure of absorbing all the necessary knowledge of how the journal works. In light of the new editorship rotation, Edith L. Taylor stepped down as PALAIOS Coeditor on October 1, 2011, after serving five years (four-year term + one year). SEPM and the PALAIOS scientific community are grateful for the excellent service and guidance Edie has provided, helping steer PALAIOS through the many changes and challenges the journal has faced since she joined the Editorial Staff in April 2006. SEPM is indebted to Edie for her dedication, hard work, and foresight …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it