MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142019617 · doi:10.1586/14779072.6.2.145

β<sub>1</sub>-adrenoceptor polymorphisms: deviation of clinical outcome with use of β-blockers in ventricular dysfunction

2008· editorial· en· W2142019617 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Tabrizchi

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · 2008
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureInternal medicineCardiologyBETA (programming language)Adrenergic receptorAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBeta blockerPropranololReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the debate continues regarding the role of polymorphisms of beta(1)-adrenoceptors on the clinical outcomes and beneficial effects of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure, we need to step back and examine the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature more closely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Cardiovascular TherapySame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207