MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142057708 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683534

BFilter - A XML Message Filtering and Matching Approach in Publish/Subscribe Systems

2010· article· en· W2142057708 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Dai, Chung–Horng Lung, Shikharesh Majumdar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceStreaming XMLXML SignatureEfficient XML InterchangeXML EncryptionXML validationXML databaseXML Schema EditorXML Schema (W3C)XML frameworkSOAPDocument Structure DescriptionMulticastXMLInformation retrievalMatching (statistics)Computer networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In publish/subscribe systems, XML message filtering performed at application layer is an important operation for XML message multicast. As a specific case of content-based multicast in application layer, XML message multicast depends on the data filtering and matching processes and the forwarding and routing schemes. As the XML data emerges in transition, XML message filtering and matching becomes more and more desirable. BFilter, proposed in this paper, conducts the XML message filtering and matching by leveraging branch points in both the XML document and user query. It evaluates user queries that use backward matching branch points to delay further matching processes until branch points match in the XML document and user query. In this way, XML message filtering can be performed more efficiently as the probability of mismatching is reduced. A number of experiments have been conducted and the results demonstrate that BFilter has better performance than the well-known YFilter for complex queries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207