MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142059174 · doi:10.1109/icdcs.1994.302461

Object properties in the Raven system

2002· article· en· W2142059174 on OpenAlexaff
David Finkelstein, Donald Acton, Terry Coatta, N.C. Hutchinson, Gerald Neufeld

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceObject (grammar)Property (philosophy)Scheme (mathematics)Object-relational mappingObject-oriented programmingSemantics (computer science)Programming languageArtificial intelligenceMethodTheoretical computer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raven is an object-oriented programming language and system that supports distributed and multiprocessor computing. This paper describes the motivation and design of Raven's object property scheme. Raven properties are used to provide system services on a per-object basis. Raven is distinguishable from similar systems in several fundamental ways: the behavioral semantics of each system supported property is truly orthogonal to those of the others, allowing properties to be combined without side effects; and all properties can be assigned dynamically, in any combination, even after object creation. Property support is provided automatically by the system. This scheme provides a simple yet powerful and flexible system where every object can have the properties it requires.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.015
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207