MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142092202

Mainstreaming Resolution 1325? Evaluating the Impact on Security Council Resolution 1325 on Country-Specific UN Resolutions

2009· article· en· W2142092202 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Renee Black

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of military and strategic studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPeacebuilding and International Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecurity councilPolitical scienceConflict resolutionMainstreamingResolution (logic)Public administrationCorporate governanceFace (sociological concept)LawSociologyComputer sciencePoliticsEconomicsSocial scienceManagementArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In October 2000, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security recognizing for the first time that women disproportionately face the consequences of conflict and should therefore be included in decision-making at all levels during peace processes and post-conflict governance. However in the eight years since its adoption, many questions remain regarding the Security Council’s commitment to this agenda. This paper examines the language of Security Council resolutions between 1998 and 2008 to evaluate how Resolution 1325 has influenced the language of conflict-specific Security Council resolutions. I conclude that while Resolution 1325 has actually led to a significant increase in the numbers of references to women in resolution language, references are much more likely to call for the protection of women and are significantly less likely to call for their active participation in decision-making processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of military and strategic studiesSame topicPeacebuilding and International SecurityFrench-language works237,207