MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142097771 · doi:10.2192/09sc026.1

Active American black bear dens adjacent to a marine beach used for foraging

2010· article· en· W2142097771 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline H. Fox, Paul C. Paquet, T. E. Reimchen

Bibliographic record

VenueUrsus · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsRaincoast Conservation FoundationUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForagingFisheryGeographyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hibernation and denning are essential to American black bears (Ursus americanus) throughout much of their range. Although den structure varies, it is generally agreed that dens provide the important functions of shelter and safety (Davis 1996). In coastal Alaska, studies indicate that most black bears den in upland areas and largely relied on large or old-growth trees (Erickson 1982, Hanson 1988). Studies of coastal areas that did not include shoreline habitats in Alaska and British Columbia (BC) suggest that black bears often den in upland areas or on slopes (e.g. Miller 1990, Davis 1996). Here, we report the opportunistic discovery of active black bear dens directly adjacent to a beach used for foraging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrsusSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207