MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142097781 · doi:10.1109/camp.1997.631905

VLSI architecture for the embedded extraction of dominant points on object contours

2002· article· en· W2142097781 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Dallaire, M. Tremblay, D. Poussart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionVery-large-scale integrationArtificial intelligenceSketchPiecewiseScale spaceNoise (video)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionSet (abstract data type)Edge detectionAlgorithmImage processingMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a special-purpose VLSI architecture for dominant point extraction along 2D contours. Such dominant points carry useful information for shape analysis and pattern recognition applications since they represent a local shape property and segment object contours into piecewise linear segments and circular arcs. The proposed architecture implements an algorithm based on the curvature primal sketch. It consists of a set of 1D systolic FIR filters performing a multiresolution analysis of the scene's object contours, a set of finite-state-machines extracting zero-crossings and extrema of the filtered data, and a set of scale-space integration cells combining the accurate locations provided by the finest filters with the noise rejection properties of the coarsest ones in order to reliably extract relevant dominant points with accurate localization. The overall architecture has been successfully implemented and integrated to a custom machine vision system with real-time edge-extraction and edge-tracking capabilities. Some experimental results obtained using this system are presented and discussed. Performance issues are also addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207