Extracting structural requirements for activity of GPR119 agonists: a hologram quantitative structure activity relationship (HQSAR) study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GPR119 is a potential target for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. GPR119 agonists minimize the side-effects observed with sulphonyl ureas and glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs. Various reported GPR119 agonists from various patents were selected for the study and a 2D-QSAR study (HQSAR) was carried out. Fifty-five molecules were selected for the study. The study was performed on a training set of 40 structurally diverse molecules with reported biological activity. The most significant HQSAR model (q 2 = 0.87, r 2 = 0.99) was obtained using atoms, bond, connection, and acceptor and donor as fragment distinction. The fragment size was kept at 4–7. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated by an external test set containing 15 molecules not included in the training set, and the predicted values were in good agreement with the experimental values. The important fragments determined by the study were used to design new drug candidates having increased biological activity and comparable physicochemical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".