Pre-procedural plasma levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 do not predict late coronary angiographic restenosis after elective stenting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Inflammatory markers may serve as an important prognostic predictor in patients with coronary heart diseases. In patients undergoing coronary interventions, it has been shown that baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) could predict late clinical restenosis. Only a few small studies have examined the possible relationship with angiographic restenosis. In patients with stable angina pectoris,we examined whether baseline CRP and IL-6 predict late coronary angiographic restenosis after stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre-procedural plasma levels of CRP and IL-6 were measured in 216 patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary stenting. Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients at 6 months. Baseline CRP levels were 6.15 +/- 0.78 mg/L versus 5.24 +/- 1.17 mg/L in the patent and restenosis groups, respectively (P=0.64). IL-6 levels were 0.46 +/- 0.03 ng/L versus 0.40 +/- 0.07 ng/L in the patent and restenosis groups, respectively (P=0.50). CRP levels were obtained again at the time of angiographic follow-up and were found to be similar in both groups (2.89 +/- 0.29 mg/L versus 2.61 +/- 0.63 mg/L, P=0.72). Moreover, in a sub-group of 43 patients, serial blood samples were obtained at several time points after the procedure up to 6 months. Both CRP and IL-6 plasma levels increased significantly in response to the procedure. CRP levels peaked at 3 days (11.27 +/- 1.53 mg/L versus 4.26 +/- 0.72 mg/L at baseline, P<0.0001). IL-6 levels reached maximum values after 24 h (1.08 +/- 0.14 ng/L versus 0.53 +/- 0.08 ng/L at baseline, P<0.0001). However, in this sub-group of patients, neither peak CRP nor IL-6 levels were found to predict late angiographic restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting is associated with transient increases in both CRP and IL-6 levels. However, pre-procedural CRP and IL-6 levels do not predict late coronary angiographic restenosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".