MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142145002 · doi:10.1109/pess.2000.868731

A fast distance relay using adaptive data window filters

2002· article· en· W2142145002 on OpenAlexaff
T.S. Sidhu, D.S. Ghotra, Manoj Sachdev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayDigital protective relayFault (geology)PhasorWindow (computing)TrippingComputer scienceProtective relayTransient (computer programming)Filter (signal processing)Solid-state relayElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Electric power systemPower (physics)Real-time computingCircuit breakerEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the design of a distance relay that, uses adaptive data window filters to provide high speed tripping. The relay uses a fault detector to detect the inception of a fault. Starting from the fault detection, the data window size is progressively increased as new fault samples become available until the window size becomes one cycle of the fundamental frequency. At each instant, a suitable filter is used for estimating voltage and current phasors. This procedure improves the transient response of the relay and allows faster convergence of the impedance estimates and, therefore, reduces the trip time. The proposed relay was tested by using fault simulations on a sample power system. Results indicate that the proposed relay design reduces the trip times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207