Design and analysis of an active predictive algorithm in wireless multicast networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the ever-increasing wireless multicast data applications recently, considerable efforts have focused on the large scale heterogeneous wireless multicast, especially those with large propagation delays, which means the feedbacks arriving at the source node are somewhat outdated and harmful to the control actions. To attack the above problem, this paper describes a novel, autonomous, and predictive wireless multicast flow control scheme, the so-called proportional, integrative plus neural network (PINN) predictive technique, which includes two components: the PI flow controller located at the wireless multicast source has explicit rate algorithm to regulate the transmission rate; and the neural network part located at the middle branch node predicts the available buffer occupancy for those longer delay receivers. The ultimate sending rate of the multicast source is the expected receiving rates computed by PI controller based on the consolidated feedback information, and it can be accommodated by its participating branches. This network-assisted property is different from the existing control schemes in that neural network controller can predict the buffer occupancy caused by those long delay receivers, which probably cause irresponsiveness of a wireless multicast flow. This active scheme makes the control more responsive to the network status, therefore, the rate adaptation can be in a timely manner for the sender to react to network congestion quick. We analyze the theoretical aspects of the proposed algorithm, show how the control mechanism can be used to design a controller to support wireless multi-rate multicast transmission based on feedback of explicit rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".