El aprendizaje de la Nueva Cultura del Agua usando TICs por los estudiantes de Enfermería Comunitaria de la Universidad de Zaragoza
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: A course on Community Nursing is taught at our university in the 3 rd and last year of the BA in Nursing. For the last six years we have been teaching an active method of information finding in the modules devoted to Health Promotion and Environmental Health. The cognitive approach to teaching and learning proposes a number of strategies such as ‘learning through discovery’ and ‘cooperative work’ (Ausubel). In the century of information and using the Information and Communication Technologies, our purpose is that the student will carry out an active information search. In this paper we analyse the results of documentation on water for human consumption in three different media: scientific papers, popular papers in regional or national printed media, and reviews. The purpose is for the students to acquire a sound competence in searching, critically reading and writing bibliographical entries for documents (Vancouver norms). But mainly that they will be able to combine the cognitive scientific data with the emotions aroused by the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it