MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142216971 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.106.055137

The Proximal Gata4 Promoter Directs Reporter Gene Expression to Sertoli Cells During Mouse Gonadal Development1

2006· article· en· W2142216971 on OpenAlexaff
Séverine Mazaud‐Guittot, Amélie Têtu, Éric Legault, Nicolas Pilon, David W. Silversides, Robert S. Viger

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGATA4BiologySertoli cellPromoterTranscription factorGreen fluorescent proteinMolecular biologyReporter geneCell biologyGeneGene expressionGeneticsEndocrinologySpermatogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The GATA4 transcription factor is an important developmental determinant for many organs, such as the heart, gut, and testis. Despite this pivotal role, our understanding of the transcriptional mechanisms that control the proper spatiotemporal expression of the GATA4 gene remains limited. We have generated transgenic mice expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker under the control of rat Gata4 5' flanking sequences. Several GATA4-expressing organs displayed GFP fluorescence, including the heart, intestine, and pancreas. In the gonads, while GATA4 is expressed in pregranulosa, granulosa, and theca ovarian cells, and Sertoli, Leydig, and peritubular testicular cells, the first 5 kb of Gata4 regulatory sequences immediately upstream of exon 1 were sufficient to direct GFP reporter expression only in testis and, specifically, in Sertoli cells. Onset of GFP expression occurred after Sertoli cell commitment and was maintained in these cells throughout development to adulthood. In vitro studies revealed that the first 118 bp of the Gata4 promoter is sufficient for full basal activity in several GATA4-expressing cell lines. Promoter mutagenesis and DNA-binding experiments identified two GC-box motifs and, particularly, one E-box element within this -118-bp region that are crucial for its activity. Further analysis revealed that members of the USF family of transcription factors, especially USF2, bind to and activate the Gata4 promoter via this critical E-box motif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207