Ionic and Electronic Transport Properties of Layered Transition Metal Oxide/Conductive Polymer Nanocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compounds which possess 3D open-framework or 2D layered structures have been long been the subject of considerable interest due to the unique environment for reaction offered by their architechure. These compounds can undergo intercalation and/or chemie douce reactions that result in the incorporation of atoms or ions into their structure. An ordering process often results which is distinctive to the starting materials and conditions of the reaction. Importantly, examination of the individual components of the system and their attributes can allow chemists to design new compounds with specific, tailor-made qualities. 2 For example, desirable properties for a variety of electrochemical applications are those that embody both ionic and electronic conduction. Electrochemical energy storage systems are becoming more complex and more important for use as energy distribution system.3 The need for more efficient ways to store renewable energy has led to the study of new materials for secondary (reversible) batteries. The goal in this area is to develop materials with high energy and power densities that allow them to be used in applications such as vehicle propulsion, photovoltaic energy storage and self contained power sources for electronic devices. 4 Redox intercalation reactions have been found to demonstrate good reversibility in electrochemical processes.5 The development of batteries based on this concept was first proposed in 1973, and has since resulted in the commercialization of intercalation batteries. 7 A reversible intercalation reaction involves the diffusion of the mobile guest species into the open structure of a rigid host lattice without any structural modification to the host. This raises the issue of access of the guest species (ion) within the lattice interstices. Reversibility of these reactions is generally due to the similarity between transition states of the forward and reverse reactions. A gain in free energy drives the reaction and is associated with a transfer of electron density between the host and guest species. Lithium is an optimum anode material for use in reversible intercalation batteries due to its capability of undergoing facile insertion into many host structures.8 It is the lightest and most electropositive metal in the electromotive series and as a result allows for
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".