Increased endothelin-1 production in patients with chronic heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentrations are elevated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), although the cause of this increase remains uncertain. We hypothesized that abnormalities in ET-1 production, clearance, or a combination of these may be the cause of elevated ET-1 concentrations in chronic CHF. The kinetics of clearance of ET-1 were measured with (125)I-labeled ET-1 in eight patients with CHF and five age-matched normal individuals. In both normal subjects and the CHF group, the kinetics of ET-1 clearance were best described by a three-compartment model. The steady-state volume of distribution of ET-1 was significantly greater in the CHF group compared with normal subjects (25.2 +/- 3.9 vs. 13.8 +/- 2.1 l/kg; P < 0.05). The total clearance rate from plasma was greater in the CHF group (0.119 +/- 0.018 vs. 0.047 +/- 0.013 l.kg(-1).min(-1); P = 0.05). The total body production rate of ET-1 was also significantly higher in patients with CHF (0.21 +/- 0.03. vs. 0.06 +/- 0.02 ng.kg(-1).min(-1); P < 0.05). It appears that increased ET-1 production rather than decreased clearance is the cause of elevated ET-1 concentrations in patients with chronic CHF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".