Supramolecular self-assembly through tellurium···halogen secondary bonds: A hexagonal grid of Te<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> and Te<sub>6</sub>Cl<sub>6</sub> rings in the solid state structure of 1,1,3-trichloro-2,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1<i>H</i>-1λ<sup>4</sup>-benzo[b]tellurophene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1,1,3-Trichloro-2,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1H-1λ4-benzo[b]tellurophene (a = 8.807(1), b = 14.495(2), c = 9.263(1) Å, β = 110.18(1)°; P21/a, Z= 4, R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.0383), prepared by reacting 1-ethynyl-1-cyclohexanol with tellurium tetrachloride, displays a hexagonal grid structure made of four-membered Te2Cl2 and 12-membered Te6Cl6 rings formed by self-assembly of Cl-Te-Cl rods through Te···Cl secondary bonds into a supramolecular 2D network. The comparison with structurally related compounds reveals that 2D layers can also be formed by similar self-assembly of eight-membered Te4I4 rings alone or in a combination of four-membered Te2I2 with eight-membered Te4I4 rings.Key words: diorganotellurium(IV), supramolecular 2D assembly, self-assembly, secondary bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".