MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experiments on Unsteady Turbulent Pipe Flow

2004· article· en· W2142332699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceMechanicsLaminar flowShear stressOpen-channel flowChézy formulaPipe flowPhysicsFlow (mathematics)K-epsilon turbulence modelClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper explores the time-wise evolution of selected turbulence parameters during gravity-driven flow establishment of incompressible fluids in rigid circular pipes. Two initial conditions are considered: flow starting from rest, passing through laminar-to-turbulent transition, and terminating in a turbulent steady state; and transient flow between two turbulent steady states. It is found that, in the second case, the properties considered, i.e., local temporal mean velocity and its transverse distribution, axial turbulence intensity, and wall shear stress, are monotonically increasing with time. However, for flow starting from rest, all properties are strongly affected by the development of turbulence. In particular, at the critical moment when laminar-to-turbulent transition is complete, the wall shear stress changes abruptly from one to the other, identifying wall shear stress as a very sensitive indicator of criticality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it