MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experiments on Unsteady Turbulent Pipe Flow

2004· article· en· W2142332699 on OpenAlexafffund
John P. Viola, Hans J. Leutheusser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceMechanicsLaminar flowShear stressOpen-channel flowChézy formulaPipe flowPhysicsFlow (mathematics)K-epsilon turbulence modelClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper explores the time-wise evolution of selected turbulence parameters during gravity-driven flow establishment of incompressible fluids in rigid circular pipes. Two initial conditions are considered: flow starting from rest, passing through laminar-to-turbulent transition, and terminating in a turbulent steady state; and transient flow between two turbulent steady states. It is found that, in the second case, the properties considered, i.e., local temporal mean velocity and its transverse distribution, axial turbulence intensity, and wall shear stress, are monotonically increasing with time. However, for flow starting from rest, all properties are strongly affected by the development of turbulence. In particular, at the critical moment when laminar-to-turbulent transition is complete, the wall shear stress changes abruptly from one to the other, identifying wall shear stress as a very sensitive indicator of criticality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207