MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142343760 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2009.5118213

Efficient hardware implementation of the hyperbolic tangent sigmoid function

2009· article· en· W2142343760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsSigmoid functionHyperbolic functionActivation functionComputer scienceTangentLookup tableVery-large-scale integrationPiecewiseInverse trigonometric functionsArtificial neural networkComputer hardwareMathematicsEmbedded systemArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient implementation of the activation function is important in the hardware design of artificial neural networks. Sigmoid, and hyperbolic tangent sigmoid functions are the most widely used activation functions for this purpose. In this paper, we present a simple and efficient architecture for digital hardware implementation of the hyperbolic tangent sigmoid function. The proposed method employs a piecewise linear approximation as a foundation, and further improves the results using a lookup table. Our design proves to be more efficient considering area times delay as a performance metric when compared to similar proposals. VLSI implementation of the proposed design using a 0.18 mum CMOS process is also presented, which shows a 35% improvement over similar recently published architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207