C-H···H-C interactions in organoammonium tetraphenylborates: another look at dihydrogen bonds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structures of the tetraphenylborates of the dabcoH+, guanidinium (MeCN solvate), and biguanidinium cations are shown to contain a variety of C-H···H-C dihydrogen (DB) bonds of nominally zero polarity, as well as a variety of N-H···N, C-H···N, N-H···Ph, and C-H···Ph hydrogen (HB) bonds. These intermolecular bonds have been characterized topologically after multipole refinement of the structures. The coexistence of the DBs and HBs in each of the structures makes it possible to establish their relative strength hierarchy. It also illustrates the importance of the DBs in satisfying the tendency of these structures to maximize the total intermolecular bonding engagement. To compare the above DBs with other DBs, the results of an extensive set of MP2/6-31G(d,p) calculations (supplied by I. Alkorta) were analyzed for reference correlations between the bond-critical parameters. Thus, for an X-H···H-Y bond, the difference Δε(H)m between the Mulliken charges on the H atoms in the uncomplexed X-H and H-Y components correlates quite well with the X-H···H-Y parameters and can be used for predicting the topological strength of an X-H···H-Y bond. The use of the difference Δε(H)c in the bond does not appear to change the correlation significantly; closer correlations are observed when the amount of charge transferred on formation of the H···H bond is used instead of Δε(H)m or Δε(H)c. Bonding interactions are obtained even between like or symmetry-related H atoms as a consequence of induced-dipole interactions, which accounts for the existence of the above intermolecular C-H···H-C bonds with d(H···H) = 2.182.57 Å, electron density at the bond-critical point of ~0.050.08 e/Å3, and a rough estimate of the H···H binding energy of ~1-5 kcal/mol. Examination of the bond-critical parameters of X-H···H-Y bonds also suggests a criterion of stability of these bonds with respect to the transition from non-shared (closed-shell) X-H···H-Y interaction to covalent (shared-shell) X···H-H···Y interaction. This transition appears to be discontinuous.Key words: bond-critical parameters, bond topology, dihydrogen bonds, hydrogen bonds, organoammonium tetraphenylborates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".