MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Opportunistic Cooperative Communication in the Presence of Co-Channel Interferences and Outdated Channel Information

2013· article· en· W2142402258 on OpenAlexaff
Yanju Gu, Salama Ikki, Sonia Aı̈ssa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel state informationComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Interference (communication)Co-channel interferenceCooperative diversitySignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Energy (signal processing)Coding (social sciences)FadingDiversity schemeTelecommunicationsProbability of errorMaximal-ratio combiningTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmMathematicsWirelessStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the impacts of co-channel interference and outdated channel state information (CSI), two main issues in practical operating environment, on the performance of opportunistic decode-and-forward cooperative networks. First, the distribution function of the effective signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio at the end receiver is derived. Then, exact closed-form expressions for the error and outage probabilities are obtained. Furthermore, simple asymptotic expressions for the error probability, which explicitly show the coding and the diversity gains, are derived and discussed. In particular, it is demonstrated that the diversity order of the system is reduced to unity when CSI is outdated, and to zero when the ratio of the interference energy to the signal energy is constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207