Oestrogen metabolism in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: catechol-O-methyltransferase pathway is not involved
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is an uncommon lung disease for which no effective method of treatment has been found. The predilection of LAM for premenopausal women has led to the assumption that hormonal factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. The aim of this study was to determine if women with LAM manifest alterations in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) pathway which is essential for preventing the generation of oestrogen derived reactive oxygen species (ROS). METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 15 women with LAM and compared with appropriate controls. The distribution of high and low activity alleles of COMT was determined with a PCR based RFLP assay. The enzymatic activity of COMT was measured in each sample and the potential presence of a circulating inhibitor of COMT was determined. Since an alteration in the COMT pathway could increase the oxidative stress, the plasma concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA), a secondary product generated from lipid peroxidation, has been used as an internal marker. RESULTS: The distribution of high and low activity alleles of COMT (named COMT(HH), COMT(LL), and COMT(HL)) was similar in the two groups with proportions of 40%, 7%, and 53%, respectively, in the women with LAM and 38%, 6%, and 56% in the control subjects. The mean (SD) COMT activity was 24.2 (12.3) pmol/min/mg protein in women with LAM and 24.1 (6.3) pmol/min/mg protein in the control group. Incubation of plasma from women in the two groups with a preparation of commercial COMT showed that no detectable COMT inhibitor was present. The plasma concentration of MDA in the women with LAM was also not significantly different from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there are no significant alterations in the COMT pathway of women with LAM. It is therefore unlikely that alterations in oestrogen mediated cell signalling pathways are mediated by oxidants derived from an excess of catecholoestrogens in LAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".